logo

Overview of Trademark Objection

A trademark objection is a preliminary hurdle in the registration process where the Registrar raises concerns about a trademark's registrability. This could be due to similarity with existing marks, lack of distinctiveness, or violation of provisions under the Trademarks Act, 1999. It is not a denial, but a chance for the applicant to clarify, justify, or amend the application. A timely and well-drafted response can help overcome the objection and move the application forward.

Understanding Trademark Objection

Trademark objections may be raised by:

  • Trademark examiners (during the examination stage), or
  • The general public or third parties (after journal publication)

Objections usually occur in the early stages of the registration process and require the applicant to respond with appropriate documentation and legal justification.

Two common instances where objections may arise:

  1. Objection Upon Publication in the Trademark Journal: Once a trademark is accepted by the Registrar, it is published in the Trademark Journal for public scrutiny. During the 90-day opposition window, any person or entity may object to the registration if they believe the mark infringes upon their rights or causes confusion in the marketplace.
  2. Objection for Prior Use of Mark Before Registration: If an applicant starts using a trademark before filing for registration, third parties can object on the grounds of conflict or pre-existing rights.

Let SNB Consultancy be your trusted partner in securing and protecting your brand identity.

Responding to Trademark Objections

When a trademark is objected to, the Registry issues an Examination Report detailing the grounds of objection. The applicant is required to submit a comprehensive reply within 30 days (or the prescribed time), addressing each point raised.

The response must be precise, legally sound, and supported with documents such as prior use proof, advertisements, sales invoices, or any other relevant evidence that can justify the registrability of the trademark.

If the reply is found satisfactory, the application proceeds to the next stage (Journal publication). If not, a Show Cause Hearing may be scheduled where the applicant must defend the trademark in person or through legal representation.

Common Reasons for Trademark Objections

  • Incorrect Form Submission
  • Incorrect Applicant Name
  • Use of Deceptive Words
  • Offensive or Inappropriate Terms
  • Insufficient Description of Goods or Services
  • Similarity with Existing Registered Marks
  • Impact on Religious Sentiments
  • Lack of Distinctiveness
  • Arbitrary Specification of Goods/Services
  • Non-Adherence to NICE Classification
  • Incomplete or Inaccurate Description
  • Wrong Trademark Class
  • Phonetic Similarity
  • Visual Similarity

Absolute Grounds for Rejection of a Trademark Application

  • Lack of Distinctiveness: The mark is generic or descriptive and not capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one business from another.
  • Prohibited under Emblems and Names Act, 1950: The use of names or symbols protected under this Act is not allowed for trademarks.
  • Customary Language or Trade Usage: Marks that consist of words commonly used in trade or the current language cannot be registered.
  • Deceptive or Confusing Nature: Marks that mislead consumers about the origin, quality, or nature of the product or service.
  • Harm to Religious Sentiments: Any trademark likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any group or section in India.
  • Scandalous or Obscene Matter: Marks that are morally offensive or vulgar in nature.
  • Excessively Descriptive Characteristics: Marks that describe the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, or other characteristics of the goods or services.

Types of Trademark Objections

  • Section 11 Objection: Raised if the proposed mark is identical or similar to an existing trademark, leading to a likelihood of confusion.
  • Section 9 Objection: Arises when the trademark consists of common names, geographical indications, or lacks inherent distinctiveness.
  • TM-1 Application Errors: Objections related to mistakes in the application form, such as incorrect design, class, or mark description.
  • Class Description Issues: When the goods or services are not adequately or correctly described, or fall under the wrong class.
  • Power of Attorney Discrepancy: If authorization documents like TM-48 are missing, incomplete, or incorrect.
  • Applicant Details Inaccuracy: Errors in the applicant's name, address, or entity type.

Documents Required for Trademark Objection Response

  • Advertisement Copies showing prior usage and promotion of the mark in the media.
  • Product Images demonstrating the mark as used on goods or packaging.
  • Sales Invoices proving commercial use of the trademark.
  • Domain Registration Proof showing the trademark being used online.
  • Website Screenshots featuring the mark prominently.

Procedure for Responding to Trademark Objection

  1. Receipt of Objection Notice: The applicant receives an Examination Report outlining specific objections.
  2. Drafting the Objection Reply: A detailed response, supported by evidence, must be submitted within 30 days.
  3. Hearing (If Scheduled): If required, the applicant must defend the mark before the Trademark Officer.
  4. Publication in Trademark Journal: Upon acceptance, the mark is published for a 90-day opposition period.
  5. Refusal & Review Petition: If refused, the applicant can file a Review Petition within 30 days.
  6. Final Registration: If no opposition is raised, the trademark is registered and certificate issued.

Addressing a "Trademark Application Objected" Status

  • Consult a Trademark Expert: Seek guidance from a professional consultant.
  • Review the Examination Report: Carefully study the objections raised.
  • Respond within 30 Days: File a detailed reply with supporting documents.
  • Provide Clear Legal Reasoning: Justify why the trademark is unique and valid.

Next Steps After Filing a Trademark Objection Response

  • Await Registrar's Evaluation: The response is reviewed for acceptance.
  • Prepare for Hearing (if required): Be ready with strong representation if scheduled.
  • Engage Trademark Professionals: Legal consultants improve chances of overcoming the objection.